Part 1: Israel as the “Bastard Child” vs Palestinians as the “Favorite Child”

The UN’s Disproportionate Focus and Double Standards

Gary opens by contrasting Israel’s treatment as the “unwanted, bastard child” of the UN with the Palestinians as the “favored and overindulged child.” This metaphor serves as a foundation for exploring how the UN’s selective focus has distorted the Israel-Palestine conflict and impacted global perceptions. Using compelling statistics, Gary highlights the UN’s heavy scrutiny of Israel, showcasing the vast number of resolutions condemning Israel compared to other global crises. This data-driven approach reveals how this double standard creates a narrative that isolates Israel and damages the UN’s credibility as an impartial body.

The Human Impact of Bias and Favoritism

To personalize the statistics, Gary shares accounts of how this dynamic affects individuals in Israel and Palestine. Israelis, he explains, experience frustration and a sense of betrayal by a global institution meant to uphold fairness, while Palestinians are often caught in a dependency cycle fueled by the UN’s preferential treatment. Through this section, audiences gain insight into how the UN’s “parenting” approach — isolating one child while overindulging the other — perpetuates conflict and prevents meaningful progress.

​

Part 2: Enabling Extremism and Undermining Peace

UNRWA and UNIFIL & Other UN Agencies

Gary shifts to a critical examination of UNRWA and UNIFIL, two agencies that exemplify the UN’s complex role in the conflict. Through data on staffing, budget allocations, and operational focus, he contrasts UNRWA’s exclusive support for Palestinian refugees with UNHCR’s global mandate, illustrating how UNRWA’s unique status has encouraged dependency and allowed extremist factions like Hamas to exploit its resources. Similarly, Gary discusses UNIFIL’s presence in Lebanon and its failure to restrain Hezbollah, highlighting how this dynamic has left Israel vulnerable to threats on its borders.

​

Empowering Extremism Through Dysfunction

Gary explores the broader consequences of these agencies’ actions, showing how UNRWA’s resources and facilities have at times been co-opted by extremist groups, fueling further violence. He underscores how these agencies’ inaction or complicity has allowed factions like Hamas and Hezbollah to grow, using the UN’s presence as cover for agendas that directly threaten regional stability. This section drives home the unintended, yet damaging, role the UN has played in enabling extremism under the guise of humanitarian support.

​

Part 3: Selective Justice and the Global Credibility Crisis

The ICC, ICJ, and the Issue of Selective Prosecution​

Gary delves into the selective prosecution practices of the ICC and ICJ, using recent cases against Israeli leaders to illustrate the double standard. Through examples of charges brought solely against Israel, he raises questions about the UN’s impartiality in international justice. The data presented here underscores a larger issue: when international courts selectively target one nation, they erode their own legitimacy and foster resentment rather than accountability.

​

The Need for Reform

In his closing segment, Gary connects the dots between the UN’s disproportionate resolutions, agency dysfunction, and selective legal actions. He argues that these practices have not only failed to bring peace but have also tarnished the UN’s standing as a neutral peacekeeper. The lecture ends on a reflective note, challenging the audience to consider the broader implications of a UN that perpetuates, rather than resolves, global conflicts.​

​

Q&A...​

Take Aways